Day 12 : L.S.F.-Kasabian

When you write copy you have the right to copyright the copy you write. You can write good and copyright but copyright doesn't mean you copy good - it might not be right good copy, right?

Now, writers of religious services write rite, and thus have the right to copyright the rite they write. Conservatives write right copy, and have the right to copyright the right copy they write. Aright wing cleric might write right rite, and have the right to copyright the right rite he has the right to write. his editor has the job of making the right rite copy right before the copyright would be right. Then it might be copy good copyright. Should Thom Wright decide to write, then Wright might write right rite, which Write has a right to copyright. Copying that rite would copy Wright's right rite, and thus violate copyright, so Wright would have the legal right to right the wrong. Right? Legals write writs which is a right or not write writs right but all writs, copied or not, are writs that are copyright. Judges make writers write writs right. Advertisers write copy which is copyright the copy writer's company, not the right of the writer to copyright. But the copy written is copyrighted as written, right? Wrongfully copying a right writ, or a right rite or copy is not right. © The Department of Redundancy Department Copyright Department Copyright, 1999

I hope all of you read that and are now infuriated. That was my goal. If I have to write a paper on the third day of class in SUMMER then you can all sift through that garbage and try to make sense of it. My hope is that a few of you will find yourself consumed by the desire to understand it completely. Good luck with that ladies and gents.

Song of the Day: This is one of my favorites. Seriously underrated band. L.S.F. by Kasabian

"In fact, being - forgive me - rather cleverer than most men, my mistakes tend to be correspondingly huger." APWBD